Forebet Review 2025: Accuracy, Features & Honest Assessment
An honest, data-driven review of Forebet. We analyzed 2,850 predictions to measure Forebet's real accuracy rate, and compare it to alternatives.
Forebet is one of the most recognized names in football prediction. It consistently ranks high in search results and has millions of monthly visitors. But popularity does not equal accuracy. We analyzed 2,850 of Forebet's predictions against actual match results to give you an honest, numbers-based assessment.
What is Forebet?
Forebet is a free football prediction website that uses mathematical algorithms to generate match outcome predictions. It covers a wide range of leagues and competitions worldwide and provides predictions for multiple bet types including 1X2 (match result), Both Teams to Score (BTTS), and Over/Under goals.
The site has been active for over a decade and has built a large user base, particularly in Europe and Africa. Predictions are generated automatically by their proprietary mathematical model, which factors in historical data, team form, and other statistical inputs.
Forebet Accuracy – The Real Numbers
Here is what our data shows:
- Accuracy: 49.4%
- Predictions analyzed: 2,850
- Ranking: 7th out of 8 tracked providers
To put this in context, here is how Forebet compares to the other providers we track:
| Rank | Provider | Accuracy | Predictions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Statarea | 54.3% | 2,679 |
| 2 | MetaPred | 52.7% | 2,850 |
| 3 | RueDesJoueurs | 51.6% | 2,688 |
| 4 | FootballPredictions | 51.4% | 2,700 |
| 5 | Vitibet | 50.2% | 2,772 |
| 6 | OneMillionPredictions | 49.8% | 2,739 |
| 7 | Forebet | 49.4% | 2,850 |
| 8 | BettingClosed | 48.8% | 2,757 |
At 49.4%, Forebet falls below the average accuracy (50.8%) of all 8 providers we track. This does not make it useless — any tool that provides structured data about upcoming matches has value — but it does mean that Forebet's predictions, taken at face value, are less reliable than most alternatives.
Forebet Features
Despite the accuracy numbers, Forebet offers a solid feature set:
- Mathematical model: Predictions are algorithm-generated, removing human bias from the process.
- Multiple bet types: Covers 1X2, BTTS, Over/Under, correct score, and half-time/full-time predictions.
- Wide league coverage: One of the broadest coverage maps in the industry, including lower divisions and international competitions.
- Free access: All predictions are available without a subscription or payment.
- Historical data: The site provides past prediction records, though interpreting them requires some effort.
Forebet Strengths
Wide league coverage. Forebet covers more leagues and competitions than most prediction sites. If you follow a smaller league or a non-European competition, Forebet likely has predictions for it.
Established reputation. With over a decade of operation, Forebet has a track record and a large community of users. This means more discussion, more feedback, and more public scrutiny of their predictions.
Easy to use interface. The site is straightforward. You can quickly find today's predictions, filter by league, and see the mathematical probability breakdown for each match.
Forebet Weaknesses
Below-average accuracy. At 49.4%, Forebet ranks 7th out of 8 providers in our tracking. This is a meaningful gap compared to the top providers like Statarea (54.3%) or MetaPred (52.7%).
No multi-source approach. Forebet relies entirely on its own algorithm. It does not cross-reference or aggregate predictions from other sources, which means it lacks the error-correction benefit that comes from combining multiple models.
Predictions can be overconfident. Forebet often displays high probability percentages (70%, 80%+) for match outcomes. Our data suggests these confidence levels are not always well-calibrated — a prediction shown at 75% probability does not hit 75% of the time.
Better Alternatives to Forebet
If accuracy is your priority, the data points to better options:
- Statarea (54.3% accuracy): The single most accurate provider in our dataset. Best for users who want to follow one source. See all provider rankings.
- MetaPred (52.7% accuracy): Aggregates predictions from 8 providers including Forebet itself. The consensus approach reduces individual model errors and delivers more consistent results. MetaPred vs Forebet head-to-head.
Both alternatives are free to use and provide a measurable accuracy advantage over Forebet.
Verdict
Forebet is a well-known, free prediction tool with broad league coverage and a user-friendly interface. However, our data shows it is not among the most accurate options available. At 49.4% accuracy over 2,850 predictions, it ranks near the bottom of the providers we track.
This does not mean Forebet is without value. It remains a useful data point — especially for leagues that other providers do not cover. But if you are making decisions based primarily on accuracy, there are better options.
The most effective strategy is not to rely on any single prediction source. Combining insights from multiple providers — which is exactly what MetaPred does — yields more reliable results than following any individual algorithm alone.
Further reading: